Competitions
CAT Prep
Upskill
Placements
MBA Co'26
RTI Response
Rankings
Score Vs. %ile
Salaries
Campus Tour

The Six IIM Alumni Report 2013 - Part Two - Stats for Top Companies in FMCG and Technology,E-Commerce,Telecom

Comments
 

ABC

When it comes to alumni influence in placements , Quantity is irrelevant , the position which alumni hold is more important. This is the reason why IIM A,B,C ,FMS, XLRI and JBIMS alumni networks have such strong influence in their placements because these institutions have 40+ year old alumni network and hence have many of their alums at top of the pyramid( MD, CEO ,Partner,Country heads) in decision making positions .

1 May 2013, 01.57 PM

+Read Replies (1)

Anonymous

Quantity becomes relevant in the sense that it gives confidence to people from a college that they can also get into a company that their seniors have gotten into in large numbers. See the numbers for top consulting firms, numbers will alone show that except for ABC other IIM students have very low prob of getting in.

1 May 2013, 06.11 PM |

Anup

Hello Interesting study by InsideIIM, kudos for such an analysis! While I am trying to understand, let me point to a discrepancy in the Part-1 and Part-2. HUL figures for IIMA is (22+23)=45 as per Part 1, while in above it is 50 (Part 2). IIM B is 49 (Part 2) and 56 (Part 1). There is a discrepancy in most companies. Could you please elaborate?

2 May 2013, 02.27 AM

+Read Replies (5)

@InsideIIM

Part 1 data is only for 1997 to 2013. Part 2 data is for all dates and also includes people who have not mentioned any dates in their profile.

2 May 2013, 08.58 AM |

Anup

Well.. In that case the figures of Part 1 is a subset of Part 2. And with that logic, Part 1value should be > Part 2. However not the case in HUL IIMB example i have given. Could you elaborate?

2 May 2013, 06.11 PM |

Anup

Just to elaborate, if 56 students are there in 1997-2013 (Part 1) how come only 49 students in (1973-2013) ? Where did the missing 7 students go?!

2 May 2013, 10.51 PM |

Insideiim Admin

.

You are right about this issue. There could be such numerical discrepancies in the part 1 of the report as there is strong case of double counting. Also, certain profiles are hidden from us as they are premium accounts which do not show in our analysis for part 2 and part 3 of the report.

2 May 2013, 11.05 PM |

Salma

they left the company and shifted to USA...can't that happen..

8 May 2013, 07.10 PM |

Anonymous

"In terms of sheer quantity FMS Delhi numbers are not as impressive. JBIMS Mumbai numbers are worse." That is because both these institutes had a very small batch size. FMS has increased its batch size only recently.

2 May 2013, 01.01 PM

+Read Replies (1)

@InsideIIM

We accounted for that before making that statement. XLRI also had a relatively small batch size until 2011 (180 - BM+HR). FMS and JBIMS are also 4 decades old. SPJIMR is younger but has far better numbers for FMCG.

2 May 2013, 01.44 PM |

ayush raghuvanshi

I request a similar analysis side to side on imt-g, mdi, nmims. Will beat many b-schools here hands down on all accounts across spectrum.

2 May 2013, 02.30 PM

+Read Replies (1)

mvb

bwahahahahahhahaha

2 May 2013, 11.40 PM |

BDC

Point to note - ABC Dominating the e-commerce side is no big deal.....I happen to work in one of these companies labelled no.1 here, and i can clearly tell you that there is no such over dominance by ABC here... Other non IIMs like NMIMS, SPJIMR, IMTG, etc. are hired regularly and infact more in number. I think other than Finance & Consulting, there is no other such sector wherein the ABCs dominate or are omni present!

2 May 2013, 11.32 PM

Simon

NITIE will have higher number with Amazon than any IIM (or, perhaps all IIMs combined)

5 May 2013, 12.52 AM

+Read Replies (2)

Insideiim Admin

.

There are 19 NITIE alums in Amazon

5 May 2013, 01.34 AM |

Simon

You're right. NITIE + Amazon filter throws 19 results in linkedin, which is gross mis-representation of NITIE alums at Amazon. The actual numbers exceed 50. Same should be the case with the IIMs. This year alone 10 alums(2013 batch) would enter Amazon, most of them have not updated their profiles. As stated, we should take these findings with a pinch of salt. For exact number of alums working in specific companies, get access to the college alumni database,

5 May 2013, 12.34 PM |

Mini Mock Test

Final 2 Days to CAT 2024 Test-44

Participants: 230

Final 3 Days to CAT 2024 Test-43

Participants: 250
College Comparison Tool - Quiz Ad

Final 4 Days to CAT 2024 Test-42

Participants: 327

Final 5 Days to CAT 2024 Test-41

Participants: 352

Final 6 Days to CAT 2024 Test-40

Participants: 339

Final 7 Days to CAT 2024 Test-39

Participants: 336

Final 8 Days to CAT 2024 Test-38

Participants: 311

Final 9 Days to CAT 2024 Test-37

Participants: 324

Final 10 Days to CAT 2024 Test-36

Participants: 285

Final 11 Days to CAT 2024 Test-35

Participants: 476

Final 12 Days to CAT 2024 Test-34

Participants: 330

Final 13 Days to CAT 2024 Test-33

Participants: 293

Final 14 Days to CAT 2024 Test-32

Participants: 275

Final 15 Days to CAT 2024 Test-31

Participants: 357

Final 16 Days to CAT 2024 Test-30

Participants: 289

Final 17 Days to CAT 2024 Test-29

Participants: 310

Final 18 Days to CAT 2024 Test-28

Participants: 341

Final 19 Days to CAT 2024 Test-26

Participants: 338

Final 20 Days to CAT 2024 Test-26

Participants: 306

Final 21 Days to CAT 2024 Test-25

Participants: 249

Final 22 Days to CAT 2024 Test-24

Participants: 266

Final 23 Days to CAT 2024 Test-23

Participants: 178

Final 24 Days to CAT 2024 Test-22

Participants: 225

Final 25 Days to CAT 2024 Test-21

Participants: 223

Final 26 Days to CAT 2024 Test-20

Participants: 276

Final 27 Days to CAT 2024 Test-19

Participants: 230

Final 28 Days to CAT 2024 Test-18

Participants: 233

Final 29 Days to CAT 2024 Test-17

Participants: 245

Final 30 Days to CAT 2024 Test-16

Participants: 276

Final 31 Days to CAT 2024 Test-15

Participants: 271

Take Free Test Here

Comments
 

ABC

When it comes to alumni influence in placements , Quantity is irrelevant , the position which alumni hold is more important. This is the reason why IIM A,B,C ,FMS, XLRI and JBIMS alumni networks have such strong influence in their placements because these institutions have 40+ year old alumni network and hence have many of their alums at top of the pyramid( MD, CEO ,Partner,Country heads) in decision making positions .

1 May 2013, 01.57 PM

+Read Replies (1)

Anonymous

Quantity becomes relevant in the sense that it gives confidence to people from a college that they can also get into a company that their seniors have gotten into in large numbers. See the numbers for top consulting firms, numbers will alone show that except for ABC other IIM students have very low prob of getting in.

1 May 2013, 06.11 PM |

Anup

Hello Interesting study by InsideIIM, kudos for such an analysis! While I am trying to understand, let me point to a discrepancy in the Part-1 and Part-2. HUL figures for IIMA is (22+23)=45 as per Part 1, while in above it is 50 (Part 2). IIM B is 49 (Part 2) and 56 (Part 1). There is a discrepancy in most companies. Could you please elaborate?

2 May 2013, 02.27 AM

+Read Replies (5)

@InsideIIM

Part 1 data is only for 1997 to 2013. Part 2 data is for all dates and also includes people who have not mentioned any dates in their profile.

2 May 2013, 08.58 AM |

Anup

Well.. In that case the figures of Part 1 is a subset of Part 2. And with that logic, Part 1value should be > Part 2. However not the case in HUL IIMB example i have given. Could you elaborate?

2 May 2013, 06.11 PM |

Anup

Just to elaborate, if 56 students are there in 1997-2013 (Part 1) how come only 49 students in (1973-2013) ? Where did the missing 7 students go?!

2 May 2013, 10.51 PM |

Insideiim Admin

.

You are right about this issue. There could be such numerical discrepancies in the part 1 of the report as there is strong case of double counting. Also, certain profiles are hidden from us as they are premium accounts which do not show in our analysis for part 2 and part 3 of the report.

2 May 2013, 11.05 PM |

Salma

they left the company and shifted to USA...can't that happen..

8 May 2013, 07.10 PM |

Anonymous

"In terms of sheer quantity FMS Delhi numbers are not as impressive. JBIMS Mumbai numbers are worse." That is because both these institutes had a very small batch size. FMS has increased its batch size only recently.

2 May 2013, 01.01 PM

+Read Replies (1)

@InsideIIM

We accounted for that before making that statement. XLRI also had a relatively small batch size until 2011 (180 - BM+HR). FMS and JBIMS are also 4 decades old. SPJIMR is younger but has far better numbers for FMCG.

2 May 2013, 01.44 PM |

ayush raghuvanshi

I request a similar analysis side to side on imt-g, mdi, nmims. Will beat many b-schools here hands down on all accounts across spectrum.

2 May 2013, 02.30 PM

+Read Replies (1)

mvb

bwahahahahahhahaha

2 May 2013, 11.40 PM |

BDC

Point to note - ABC Dominating the e-commerce side is no big deal.....I happen to work in one of these companies labelled no.1 here, and i can clearly tell you that there is no such over dominance by ABC here... Other non IIMs like NMIMS, SPJIMR, IMTG, etc. are hired regularly and infact more in number. I think other than Finance & Consulting, there is no other such sector wherein the ABCs dominate or are omni present!

2 May 2013, 11.32 PM

Simon

NITIE will have higher number with Amazon than any IIM (or, perhaps all IIMs combined)

5 May 2013, 12.52 AM

+Read Replies (2)

Insideiim Admin

.

There are 19 NITIE alums in Amazon

5 May 2013, 01.34 AM |

Simon

You're right. NITIE + Amazon filter throws 19 results in linkedin, which is gross mis-representation of NITIE alums at Amazon. The actual numbers exceed 50. Same should be the case with the IIMs. This year alone 10 alums(2013 batch) would enter Amazon, most of them have not updated their profiles. As stated, we should take these findings with a pinch of salt. For exact number of alums working in specific companies, get access to the college alumni database,

5 May 2013, 12.34 PM |