WATPI Prep
Workshops
CAT' 23 Analysis
RTI Response
Selection Criteria 2023
Rankings
Best 50
Placements
Score Vs. %ile
Salaries

Reduction in Take Home Salary - Important for all graduating in 2013 and beyond

Comments
 

Anusheel Shrivastava

Correction required - "Employee’s contributions to Provident Fund – Is always 12% of the basic salary"- Actually it is minimum 12%, an employee can always contribute more if he wants, but employer will not match the increased contribution. Although most people don't use the options of increasing, but many people use it, specially those who are going for some foreign jobs, so as to earn a secured 8.5% interest on a big amount. Though a tangential issue, but I pointed it out so that Junta reading this have right idea!

29 Dec 2012, 03.05 AM

+Read Replies (1)

Prince Doshi

Yes its correct. The contribution is always 12% since from tax perspective, only 12% contribution is exempt from tax. Any contribution higher than that is taxable under the head 'Salary' and therefore it is not advisable to increase the contribution from more than 12%. Thanks for pointing out.

29 Dec 2012, 11.04 AM |

Pankaj

What about voluntary PF? Is it chargeable too? VPF is considered as contribution for tax exemption. Another query: Since base level for PF contribution is increased now, will it increase our CTC and reduce our take home salary

29 Dec 2012, 08.53 PM

+Read Replies (1)

Prince Doshi

No your CTC will remain same but as explained above, your net take home salary will reduce. Your employer is not going to pay you more out of his own pocket and therefore, your total CTC will continue to remain same with reduced take home salary. Employee's contribution to PF is included in your taxable income. But, the same will be allowed as deduction under section 80C (maximum of Rs 1 lac). On account of this deduction, employee's contribution to PF is considered as exempt from tax and therefore you are right in considering VPF as contribution for tax exemption. But there is a thin line of difference between exemption and deduction. Separately, employer's contribution to PF in excess of 12% of salary will always be taxable. Hope this may clarify your doubt.

29 Dec 2012, 10.19 PM |

Shashank

In the table you mentioned Take Home salary as 651000, but the CTC was supposed to be 650000. Don't you think the take home would be much lesser considering tds and other deductions?

30 Dec 2012, 12.18 AM

+Read Replies (1)

Prince Doshi

Ur take home salary is 651000 (ie greater than CTC of 650,000) on account of the bonus component of Rs 100,000 which I have considered in the above example that is over and above ur CTC. Ur take home is lesser. Ur take home is 651,000 on your income of Rs 750,000 (CTC of 650,000 + Bonus of 100,000). Hope this clarifies ur query.

30 Dec 2012, 06.34 PM |

Mini Mock Test

CUET-PG Mini Mock 2 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 400

CUET-PG Mini Mock 3 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 174
InsideIIM Gold - Q&A
WATPI S04 (Quiz)

CUET-PG Mini Mock 1 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 763

MBA Admissions 2024 - WAT 1

Participants: 216

SNAP Quantitative Skills

Participants: 511

SNAP Quant - 1

Participants: 948
College Comparison Tool - Quiz Ad

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 1

Participants: 938

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 355

SNAP DILR Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 243

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 436

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 187

SNAP LR Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 247

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 205

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 295

SNAP - Quant Mini Mock 5

Participants: 52

XAT Decision Making 2020

Participants: 445

XAT Decision Making 2019

Participants: 348

XAT Decision Making 2018

Participants: 447

XAT Decision Making -10

Participants: 584

XAT Decision Making -11

Participants: 456

XAT Decision Making - 12

Participants: 417

XAT Decision Making - 13

Participants: 352

XAT Decision Making - 14

Participants: 354

XAT Decision Making - 15

Participants: 395

XAT Decision Making - 16

Participants: 467

XAT Decision Making - 17

Participants: 511

XAT Decision Making 2021

Participants: 516

LR Topic Test

Participants: 2716

DI Topic Test

Participants: 1233

ParaSummary Topic Test

Participants: 2071

Take Free Test Here

Comments
 

Anusheel Shrivastava

Correction required - "Employee’s contributions to Provident Fund – Is always 12% of the basic salary"- Actually it is minimum 12%, an employee can always contribute more if he wants, but employer will not match the increased contribution. Although most people don't use the options of increasing, but many people use it, specially those who are going for some foreign jobs, so as to earn a secured 8.5% interest on a big amount. Though a tangential issue, but I pointed it out so that Junta reading this have right idea!

29 Dec 2012, 03.05 AM

+Read Replies (1)

Prince Doshi

Yes its correct. The contribution is always 12% since from tax perspective, only 12% contribution is exempt from tax. Any contribution higher than that is taxable under the head 'Salary' and therefore it is not advisable to increase the contribution from more than 12%. Thanks for pointing out.

29 Dec 2012, 11.04 AM |

Pankaj

What about voluntary PF? Is it chargeable too? VPF is considered as contribution for tax exemption. Another query: Since base level for PF contribution is increased now, will it increase our CTC and reduce our take home salary

29 Dec 2012, 08.53 PM

+Read Replies (1)

Prince Doshi

No your CTC will remain same but as explained above, your net take home salary will reduce. Your employer is not going to pay you more out of his own pocket and therefore, your total CTC will continue to remain same with reduced take home salary. Employee's contribution to PF is included in your taxable income. But, the same will be allowed as deduction under section 80C (maximum of Rs 1 lac). On account of this deduction, employee's contribution to PF is considered as exempt from tax and therefore you are right in considering VPF as contribution for tax exemption. But there is a thin line of difference between exemption and deduction. Separately, employer's contribution to PF in excess of 12% of salary will always be taxable. Hope this may clarify your doubt.

29 Dec 2012, 10.19 PM |

Shashank

In the table you mentioned Take Home salary as 651000, but the CTC was supposed to be 650000. Don't you think the take home would be much lesser considering tds and other deductions?

30 Dec 2012, 12.18 AM

+Read Replies (1)

Prince Doshi

Ur take home salary is 651000 (ie greater than CTC of 650,000) on account of the bonus component of Rs 100,000 which I have considered in the above example that is over and above ur CTC. Ur take home is lesser. Ur take home is 651,000 on your income of Rs 750,000 (CTC of 650,000 + Bonus of 100,000). Hope this clarifies ur query.

30 Dec 2012, 06.34 PM |