CAT Prep

RTI Response

Rankings

Placements

Score Vs. %ile

Salaries

Campus Tour

Upskill

Career Show

CAT 2016 Detailed Analysis By Endeavor Careers

Dec 4, 2016 | 2 minutes |

Join InsideIIM GOLD

Webinars & Workshops

Compare B-Schools

Free CAT Course

Take Free Mock Tests

Upskill With AltUni

CAT Study Planner

CUET-PG Mini Mock 2 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 415

CUET-PG Mini Mock 3 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 176

CUET-PG Mini Mock 1 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 770

MBA Admissions 2024 - WAT 1

Participants: 234

SNAP Quantitative Skills

Participants: 514

SNAP Quant - 1

Participants: 952

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 1

Participants: 945

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 360

SNAP DILR Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 245

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 440

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 187

SNAP LR Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 250

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 207

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 298

SNAP - Quant Mini Mock 5

Participants: 52

XAT Decision Making 2020

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making 2019

Participants: 349

XAT Decision Making 2018

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making -10

Participants: 586

XAT Decision Making -11

Participants: 457

XAT Decision Making - 12

Participants: 417

XAT Decision Making - 13

Participants: 352

XAT Decision Making - 14

Participants: 354

XAT Decision Making - 15

Participants: 395

XAT Decision Making - 16

Participants: 468

XAT Decision Making - 17

Participants: 511

XAT Decision Making 2021

Participants: 518

LR Topic Test

Participants: 2737

DI Topic Test

Participants: 1239

ParaSummary Topic Test

Participants: 2096

Test administration Centres across Mumbai reported smooth administration of the test. There was Chaos before the test (due to a high number of candidates) but the test was smoothly conducted. No major reports of technical glitches. Security checks were adequate.  

What was different as compared to CAT 2015?
A. A normal calculator as compared to scientific calculator last year.
B. RC & VA questions were interspersed. Last year, they were given as separate sub-sections.

  One glitch In the morning slot, one symbol was not clearly visible. Students were unable to interpret the square root sign as it was deceptively similar to a 'Pi' sign. This affected 3-4 questions and students were unsure of how to tackle it.  

Sectional Analysis
Section 1: VA+ RC : Like CAT 2015, there were 24 RC questions spread across 5 passages. 10 questions (Type in Questions) across Parajumbles, Summary & Odd Man Out Questions.

Verdict: Easiest of the 3 sections. 25-27 attempts were possible. LRDI : 32 questions Definitely the trickiest section. A lot of data had to be analysed and a lot of thinking was required. Students broke into a sweat trying to crack these sets. Sets were calculation intensive too. Verdict : 14-16 questions can be considered a good attempt. Quantitative Aptitude : 34 questions. A standard Aptitude paper with all topics. Geometry & Arithmetic dominated the section. There was a very good mix of easy, moderate and difficult questions. Around 22-24 attempts can be considered good. Overall analysis : CAT 2016 had the same structure as CAT 2015 but the difficulty level was up by 1-2 notches. Hence the cutoffs and scores will see a fall as compared to CAT 2015. Overall, 60 attempts with 85% accuracy should fetch a 95 percentile call. Estimated sectional cut-offs (at 85 percentile)

Each question was worth 3 marks.
Verbal : 35
LRDI : 20
Quant : 30.

Estimated scores for :
99 percentile : 155+
97 percentile : 130+
95 percentile : 115+

The paper was well-designed and really tested the candidate's preparation and aptitude. Kudos to the academic team!     -------------- About the Author:

Hemang Panchmatia
Senior Faculty, Endeavor Institute.