CAT Prep

RTI Response

Rankings

Placements

Score Vs. %ile

Salaries

Campus Tour

Upskill

Career Show

SNAP 2016 Detailed Analysis And Cutoffs

Dec 18, 2016 | 6 minutes |

Join InsideIIM GOLD

Webinars & Workshops

Compare B-Schools

Free CAT Course

Take Free Mock Tests

Upskill With AltUni

CAT Study Planner

CUET-PG Mini Mock 2 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 415

CUET-PG Mini Mock 3 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 176

CUET-PG Mini Mock 1 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 770

MBA Admissions 2024 - WAT 1

Participants: 234

SNAP Quantitative Skills

Participants: 514

SNAP Quant - 1

Participants: 952

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 1

Participants: 945

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 360

SNAP DILR Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 245

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 440

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 187

SNAP LR Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 250

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 207

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 298

SNAP - Quant Mini Mock 5

Participants: 52

XAT Decision Making 2020

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making 2019

Participants: 349

XAT Decision Making 2018

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making -10

Participants: 586

XAT Decision Making -11

Participants: 457

XAT Decision Making - 12

Participants: 417

XAT Decision Making - 13

Participants: 352

XAT Decision Making - 14

Participants: 354

XAT Decision Making - 15

Participants: 395

XAT Decision Making - 16

Participants: 468

XAT Decision Making - 17

Participants: 511

XAT Decision Making 2021

Participants: 518

LR Topic Test

Participants: 2737

DI Topic Test

Participants: 1239

ParaSummary Topic Test

Participants: 2096

Symbiosis National Aptitude Test (SNAP) is the combined test for 15 Symbiosis Institutes offering 22 Programs including one in Sports Management through their SSSS! Of these, the Core MBA program is offered at SIBM-Pune, SCMHRD, SIMS, SIBM-Bangalore, and SIBM-Hyderabad. Specialized institutes for Mass Communication (SIMC), for Operations Management (SIOM), Telecom Management (SITM), for Hospital and Health Care Management (SIHS) and a host others are a specialty from the Symbiosis Stable!   Highlights of SNAP 2016 SNAP 2016 Paper Pattern
Duration of the paper 120 min
No of Questions 150
No of Sections 4
Marking pattern + 1
Negative marking 1/4th of the allotted mark
Total Marks allotted 150
 
S.no Sections Total Marks No of Questions
1 General English 40 40
2 Quantitative Ability 40 40
3 General Awareness: General Knowledge, Current Affairs, Business Scenario 30 30
4 Analytical & Logical Reasoning 40 40
  Total 150 150
  SNAP 2016 Analysis & Cutoffs SNAP is an exam that requires the student to keep moving on and not waste time on any question that he/she is not able to answer. Solving 150 questions in 120 minutes requires presence of mind and tremendous speed! That is less than a minute per question.  Considering that there are 30 questions of General Knowledge, it is still required a different mindset and speed (a la T20 match in Cricket) to be able to ace the SNAP exam. The ideal time break-up should have been as below with the number of attempts that a good student should have made to ensure a call from the top Symbiosis Institutes
S.no Sections Expected time for the section in minutes Expected number of attempts Expected Marks
1 General English 30 30 - 34 22 – 24
2 Quantitative Ability 40 20 - 22 16 – 18
3 General Awareness: 8 -10 8 - 10 3 - 4
4 Analytical & Logical Reasoning 40 16 - 18 13 – 15
  Total 120 74 – 84 57 – 64
  General English The English section had no surprises except that there were TWO passages of Reading Comprehension for a total of 11 marks. The two RCs, though long, had very simple and easy questions. Any student who had given time to attempt the RC passages would have got full marks in the same. There were almost 10 Fill-in-the-blank (FIB) questions with various types. Four of which were of single blank and single word, two of them with a similar word meaning words to be selected for a single blank and 4 others which required one to understand the usage of homonyms (similar sounding words but with different meanings) to answer the FIBs. The English section had liberal dose of Vocabulary with Synonyms, Antonyms, Analogies and Idioms and Phrases accounting for 14 marks. There were THREE Para-jumble questions (not very difficult) and TWO Critical Reasoning questions, which were easily doable. Overall the paper was doable and a student who gives about 30 minutes in this section would have easily attempted close to 30/32 questions (or even more) and a get a comfortable score of 20+  
Sub Area # Of Questions Difficulty Level
Fill-in-the-Blanks (Single Blank) 4 Easy
Fill-in the-Blanks (Single blank, with same meaning) 2 Easy
Fill-in-the-Blanks (Homonyms) 4 Easy to Moderate
Vocab 3 Moderate
Synonyms 3 Difficult
Antonyms 3 Difficulty
Idioms and Phrases 2 Easy
Analogies 3 Moderate
Para Jumbles 3 Easy to Moderate
Critical Reasoning 2 Easy to Moderate
READING COMPREHENSION 11 Easy
TOTAL 40 Easy to Moderate
  Quantitative Aptitude The Quant section was very much on the lines of the previous SNAP papers. There was a heavy tilt towards Arithmetic with about 9 questions in the same. Algebra (if we include Numbers in this) would be the highest weightage area in the SNAP paper as there were 12 questions in this (of which 6 questions were from Numbers area itself). The surprise, however, was that there were 7 questions in Geometry and Mensuration. A good student should have spent about 40 minutes in this section and he/she could have identified at least 22 to 25 questions that were easy. However, having said the above, it is normal that most students always find the Quant area either tough or lengthy! Hence, a good score in this section would be any thing more than 18!
Area Topic No of Questions
Arithmetic 9
Algebra 6
Numbers Number Theory 6
Pure Math 4
Geometry 7
Miscellaeneous Venn Diagram and Others 2
DATA Interpretation Tables (3) + PIE Charts (3) 6
  Analytical and Logical Reasoning (LR) This section was a nightmare for a lot of students. The fact that they have increased the number of questions and reduced the marks (instead of 2 marks per questions, in SNAP 2016, each logic had only 1 mark for the correct answer) made it difficult for students to score more in this section. Except for a few questions on Series and Input/Output type, most of the questions in LR were either difficult or time consuming. There were questions on Clocks, Calendars, Blood Relations, Coding-Decoding type among others. Some of the questions resembled the question types that come in MENSA puzzles! Overall this section was difficult. Ideally, the student should have spent about 30 odd minutes and attempted around 15 to 20 questions. The extra time (that could have been allotted to this section) should have been allotted to either English or the QA area to maximize scores. A good score in this section would be 14+   General Awareness The SNAP people were true to their word. The questions were from the current affairs and general knowledge areas and that too from the past two years! A student who follows news would have found this section actually easy (for a change!). A good attempt in this section would be around 10+ questions and getting a positive score of 4 or more!
Institute Expected cutoff mark
SIBM Pune 60 – 62
SCMHRD 58 – 60
SIIB 52 – 53
SIBM Bangalore 50 – 52
SIMS 44 - 45
SITM/SIOM 40 - 42