Join InsideIIM GOLD
Webinars & Workshops
Compare B-Schools
Free CAT Course
Take Free Mock Tests
Upskill With AltUni
CAT Study Planner
Open source has turned into the accepted standard for software development and substantiated itself as a suitable business model in modern software development. While making source code unreservedly accessible for redistribution and alteration may appear to be unreasonable, the accomplishment of organizations like Red Hat and Canonical are verification that an open source model can turn a benefit and recently with Microsoft adopting Open source philosophy by bringing Linux to its platform cements the argument that open source in business is unavoidable.
Its birthplace started with the GNU Project when Richard Stallman presented GPL Licensing which cleared a path for the "copyleft" or "viral" strategy for authorizing as in anybody can openly duplicate, alter, and appropriate the code however can't matter extra permitting confinements. In any case, Stallman and advocates of free software development were the minority of the time.
Overflowing with legislative issues and a permit that was seen by numerous individuals as excessively liberal, free programming was not alluring to organizations. It wasn't until the expression "free programming" was rebranded as "open source" decades later that organizations started to get on to the advantages of open and collaborative software development.
The Apache Software Foundation was one of the main tasks to join under the open source moniker. The ASF set numerous points of reference for how open source ought to be drawn closer monetarily, including making the Apache License which considered indistinguishable opportunities from the GPL without necessitating that subsidiary works be conveyed under a similar licensing. This new, adaptable permit prepared for businesses to adopt open source strategy.
As the development kept on picking up standard prevalence and footing, GitHub conveyed open source to the world with the pull and push request to software projects making it easier than ever to contribute, which spurred an unprecedented network effect. It was the network effect and speed at which open source communities could innovate that ultimately caught the attention of software executives.
To prevail as an open source organization, organizations should initially be a decent steward of open source. This implies no freemium plans or counterfeit confinements, permitting open source and restrictive software licensing, and removing restrictions for contribution. The best way to see is what is your company's approach to open source and what success would it bring to the organization and to the open source community in the long run. This can be further instated down the line by employees championing for open source and providing specifics on open source best practices like contribution licensing agreements and open API access.
In conclusion, organizations should look beyond attaching a cost to software development and looking at how adopting open source strategies can help organizations create disruptive technologies while being a part of a rich community which keeps on growing day by day.