CAT Prep

RTI Response

Rankings

Placements

Score Vs. %ile

Salaries

Campus Tour

Upskill

Career Show

FMS Delhi Fraternity Forecasts The US Presidential Elections 2016 - Who Will Win

Nov 2, 2016 | 3 minutes |

Join InsideIIM GOLD

Webinars & Workshops

Compare B-Schools

Free CAT Course

Take Free Mock Tests

Upskill With AltUni

CAT Study Planner

CUET-PG Mini Mock 2 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 415

CUET-PG Mini Mock 3 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 176

CUET-PG Mini Mock 1 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 770

MBA Admissions 2024 - WAT 1

Participants: 234

SNAP Quantitative Skills

Participants: 514

SNAP Quant - 1

Participants: 952

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 1

Participants: 945

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 360

SNAP DILR Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 245

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 440

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 187

SNAP LR Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 250

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 207

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 298

SNAP - Quant Mini Mock 5

Participants: 52

XAT Decision Making 2020

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making 2019

Participants: 349

XAT Decision Making 2018

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making -10

Participants: 586

XAT Decision Making -11

Participants: 457

XAT Decision Making - 12

Participants: 417

XAT Decision Making - 13

Participants: 352

XAT Decision Making - 14

Participants: 354

XAT Decision Making - 15

Participants: 395

XAT Decision Making - 16

Participants: 468

XAT Decision Making - 17

Participants: 511

XAT Decision Making 2021

Participants: 518

LR Topic Test

Participants: 2737

DI Topic Test

Participants: 1239

ParaSummary Topic Test

Participants: 2096

The Management students at the Faculty of Management Studies – University of Delhi (FMS-Delhi) broke the stereotype of MBA being all about case studies and academics by forecasting 2016 US Presidential Elections.

Completing a research paper under the mentorship of Dr. Pankaj Sinha, FMS Delhi final year students have predicted the results of the 2016 US Presidential Elections. The research also elaborated the impact of the expected outcome on various macroeconomic variables of U.S. economy post elections. These research papers have been circulated and published in renowned international economics forums like IDEAS, New Economics Papers, Econpapers etc.

The Cambridge University Press is currently reviewing for “British Journal of Political Science”, research entitled “Forecasting United States Presidential election 2016 using multiple regression models”, conducted by Dr. Pankaj Sinha, Ankit Nagarnaik, Kislay Raj and Vineeta Suman. The paper points to a victory for Clinton in the presidential elections with a vote share of around 48%, while Donald Trump being restricted to a vote share of around 40%. The students at Faculty of Management Studies also extended the study by applying various statistical techniques through their paper “Forecasting 2016 US Presidential Elections Using Factor Analysis and Regression Model” (Dr. Pankaj Sinha, Sandeep Srinivas, Anik Paul and Gunjan Chaudhari), under review at “Journal of Prediction Markets”, by the University of Buckingham Press, to gain wider international acceptance for their study on the prediction. This also predicts a victory for Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump, vote share being around 45.5% and 39.5% respectively for the two candidates.

“We discussed several factors while developing a prediction model for the election. As opposed to what several naysayers are stating, our research proves that in spite of the weight of the prolonged incumbency of the Democratic party upon her, Clinton will not have difficulties in defeating Trump in the upcoming elections.”, says Dr. Sinha while discussing the study.

In both the papers, the results show a remarkable deviation from the contemporary discussions that economic indicators like the unemployment rate and healthcare spending play an important role in voting pattern. Instead, it is a combination of variables like Presidential job approval and contemporary scandals that influence the voting decision.

Links to papers:

Title: Forecasting United States Presidential Election 2016 Using Multiple Regression Models

Pankaj Sinha, Ankit Nagarnaik, Kislay Raj and Vineeta Suman

https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74641/1/MPRA_paper_74641.pdf

Title: Forecasting 2016 US Presidential Elections Using Factor Analysis and Regression Model

Pankaj Sinha, Sandeep Srinivas, Anik Paul, Gunjan Chaudhari

https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74618/1/MPRA_paper_74618.pdf