Competitions

CAT Prep

Upskill

Placements

MBA Co'26

RTI Response

Rankings

Score Vs. %ile

Salaries

Campus Tour

Why Snapdeal Slipped & What It Could Have Done To Circumvent It

Aug 23, 2018 | 3 minutes |

Join InsideIIM GOLD

Webinars & Workshops

Compare B-Schools

Free CAT Course

Take Free Mock Tests

Upskill With AltUni

CAT Study Planner

Final 19 Days to CAT 2024 Test-26

Participants: 95

Final 20 Days to CAT 2024 Test-26

Participants: 165

Final 21 Days to CAT 2024 Test-25

Participants: 140

Final 22 Days to CAT 2024 Test-24

Participants: 160

Final 23 Days to CAT 2024 Test-23

Participants: 97

Final 24 Days to CAT 2024 Test-22

Participants: 153

Final 25 Days to CAT 2024 Test-21

Participants: 143

Final 26 Days to CAT 2024 Test-20

Participants: 186

Final 27 Days to CAT 2024 Test-19

Participants: 168

Final 28 Days to CAT 2024 Test-18

Participants: 166

Final 29 Days to CAT 2024 Test-17

Participants: 173

Final 30 Days to CAT 2024 Test-16

Participants: 191

Final 31 Days to CAT 2024 Test-15

Participants: 183

Final 32 Days to CAT 2024 Test-14

Participants: 188

Final 33 Days to CAT 2024 Test-13

Participants: 190

Final 34 Days to CAT 2024 Test-12

Participants: 223

CAT 2017 VARC SLOT- 2

Participants: 307

CAT 2017 DILR SLOT- 2

Participants: 150

CAT 2017 VARC SLOT- 1

Participants: 295

CAT 2017 DILR SLOT- 1

Participants: 103

CAT 2017 QUANT SLOT 1

Participants: 149

CAT 2017 QUANT SLOT 2

Participants: 68

CAT 2018 QUANT SLOT 2

Participants: 65

CAT 2018 QUANT SLOT 1

Participants: 105

CAT 2018 DILR SLOT- 2

Participants: 54

CAT 2018 DILR SLOT- 1

Participants: 81

CAT 2018 VARC SLOT- 2

Participants: 199

CAT 2018 VARC SLOT- 1

Participants: 291

Final 35 Days to CAT 2024 Test-11

Participants: 151

Final 36 Days to CAT 2024 Test-10

Participants: 122

#Snapdeal, valuation has plummeted & it is up for sale. For a company, which once was perched at a venerable # 2, the fall is steep & hurtful. Let me share with you, my take on the reasons that have resulted in it having to face this ignominy. 1. Excessive focus on ‘vanity’ metric: Snapdeal, took decisions to maximise– Gross Merchandise Value (#GMV). a. Suggestion: It should have, instead focused on maximising ‘Net Promoter Score’ (#NPS). 2. Competitor-focused: Snapdeal, till recently was obsessed with a burning desire to overtake Flipkart, and be crowned the ‘numero uno’ of e-commerce business! a. Suggestion: It should have, instead, focused on winning over trust of its customers & strove to become the 1st choice among them! 3. Unintentionally, went to bed with a few investors who took a short-term perspective on their investment: Therefore, some of these investors encouraged Snapdeal to recklessly pursue the vanity metric – GMV, with an ulterior motive of pumping up valuation & exiting! a. Suggestion: It should have wisely chosen investors whose mindset & values were aligned with it & were willing to work alongside to make it stronger by taking a long-term view of their investment! 4. Invested ‘raised’ funds in ‘bribing’ customers & / or creating ‘white elephant’ overheads: Indian customers place order with e-commerce platforms that offer the most attractive discount. Bowing to this reality, Snapdeal indiscriminately invested a lion’s share of the funds raised in bribing customers! Another chunk of the funds went in creating ‘expensive’ overheads – hiring people at ‘ exorbitant’ salary, then renting office space to house them! a. Suggestion: i. It should have judiciously utilised funds to: a. Build & deepen relationship with customers. b. Create infrastructure to help deliver a pleasurable experience to its customers! 5. Pursuing opportunities, instead of reducing / eliminating customer’s pain points: The founder’s mindset seems to be leverage opportunities in e-commerce space, in India, to make money. a. Suggestion: Entrepreneurs should start a startup with an objective of solving a customers' ‘pain point’! And, if they can succeed in either reducing or eliminating the pain point then the customers’ will reward them by giving them business. Result: business will boom! 6. Blindly copying a successful formula: Snapdeal, like Flipkart, fast followed #Amazon & #Alibaba, & adopted their business model without understanding its essence! a. Suggestion: E-commerce players, in India, at various times got inspired by Amazon or Alibaba’s business model and tried to replicate it in India. But they replicated the visible part of the business model – boosting revenue. But what they did not 'copy' was their obsession to keep cost under control! Take Amazon - One of its stated values which is lives dictates that it not spend a single dime on any initiative, which does not enhance customer’s experience! 7. Throwing money & people to solve a problem: Many Indian companies’, including e-commerce companies’, intuitive response on facing a problem is to ‘throw people & money’ to contain – if not solve – it. Snapdeal too has adopted this formula! Whenever sales showed signs of slowing down it threw in more discount & / or added more people on its roll! a. Suggestion: Throwing people & money at problems does not necessarily solve a problem. On the contrary it may just aggravate it as Snapdeal has discovered to its horror! It should have utilized the money to build infrastructure to deliver an awesome experience to customers, which results in deepen of relationship. Do you agree with my analysis? Please feel to share your views & add value to the discussion!