CAT Prep

RTI Response

Rankings

Placements

Score Vs. %ile

Salaries

Campus Tour

Upskill

Career Show

Dealing with Percentages – Part 2

Mar 29, 2013 | 6 minutes |

Join InsideIIM GOLD

Webinars & Workshops

Compare B-Schools

Free CAT Course

Take Free Mock Tests

Upskill With AltUni

CAT Study Planner

CUET-PG Mini Mock 2 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 419

CUET-PG Mini Mock 3 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 176

CUET-PG Mini Mock 1 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 770

MBA Admissions 2024 - WAT 1

Participants: 242

SNAP Quantitative Skills

Participants: 515

SNAP Quant - 1

Participants: 952

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 1

Participants: 950

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 361

SNAP DILR Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 245

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 440

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 187

SNAP LR Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 250

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 207

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 298

SNAP - Quant Mini Mock 5

Participants: 54

XAT Decision Making 2020

Participants: 449

XAT Decision Making 2019

Participants: 349

XAT Decision Making 2018

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making -10

Participants: 588

XAT Decision Making -11

Participants: 457

XAT Decision Making - 12

Participants: 417

XAT Decision Making - 13

Participants: 352

XAT Decision Making - 14

Participants: 354

XAT Decision Making - 15

Participants: 397

XAT Decision Making - 16

Participants: 468

XAT Decision Making - 17

Participants: 511

XAT Decision Making 2021

Participants: 518

LR Topic Test

Participants: 2742

DI Topic Test

Participants: 1241

ParaSummary Topic Test

Participants: 2107

This is in continuation of my previous post. In case you haven’t gone through it, I suggest you read that first.

(You can read 'Dealing with Percentages – Part 1here)

In Part 1, I discussed the basic concepts, covering the following:

I would like to discuss a few more ideas in this post. Let us begin.

Successive Percentage Change:

I am sure that you would have seen retail stores with offers like “50% + 40% off”. If my memory serves me right, these types of offers were made extremely popular by Koutons. I always thought of it as a “90% off” offer but clearly I was wrong. I guess some of you might have made the same mistake as well. A “50% + 40% off” does not mean a “90% off”. It actually means that you will be given a discount of 50% first and then on the reduced price you will be given another 40% discount.

Let us calculate to figure out how much this actually means.

Let us assume that the T-shirt you are trying to buy costs Rs. 100. A 50% discount would bring down the price of the T-shirt to Rs. 50. Another 40% discount on the reduced price of Rs. 50 would further bring down the price by Rs. 20 (which is 40% of 50), to Rs. 30. So, the price has effectively gone down from Rs. 100 to Rs. 30 which means that the effective discount has been 70% and not 90%.

Let me ask you another question. Try to answer it in your head before you actually scroll down and check the answer.

(Join the InsideIIM Test Prep group on Facebook here)

Example 1: 

Shop A is selling a T-shirt at a discount of 50% + 40% on the MRP whereas shop B is selling the same T-shirt at a discount of 40% + 50%. Should you buy the T-shirt from Shop A or Shop B?

Now, there may be a few things going on in your head like ‘A’ is better because it is offering the higher percentage first or ‘B’ is better because it is offering the higher percentage later or this cannot be determined until and unless we know the MRP of the T-shirt. Well, stop your internal monologue! The answer is that it would not make a difference whether you buy it from Shop A or from Shop B. Don’t believe me? Do the math!

Let us assume that the MRP of the T-shirt is ‘x’

From Shop A, a 50% discount would bring down the price to 0.5x and another 40% discount would bring down the price to 0.3x

From Shop B, a 40% discount would bring down the price to 0.6x and another 50% discount would bring down the price to 0.3x

As you can see, the sale price is the same in both cases.

In case you are wondering as to why it is the same in both cases, it is because percentages are multiplicative in nature and p*q is always the same as q*p.

For future reference, you can use this formula for effective % change in case of successive % changes of a% and b%:

Note: Please keep in mind the ‘+’ & ‘-’ signs while using this formula.

If you put a = 50% and b = 40% (from the above example), you would get 110%, which would be the incorrect answer. You should use -50% and -40% to get the correct answer of -70%. You will have to use negative values for the above example because the % changes considered are discounts.

Example 2:

A company’s revenue grew by 10% and 20% in 2009 and 2010 but fell by 25% in 2011. What was the net % change?

Use the formula for the first two years = 10 + 20 + 10*20/100 = 32

Combine this with the last year = 32 – 25 + (32)(-25)/100 = 7 – 8 = -1%

Compensating Percentage Change:

I am sure that you must have encountered questions like these:

a)     The price of beer has gone up by 25%. By how much should you reduce your consumption so that your expenses do not change?

b)     Ravi got a salary hike of 10%. The new boss thought this shouldn’t have happened because Ravi doesn’t deserve it, so he slashes Ravi’s salary by 10%. Is Ravi back to the original? If no, then by what % should Ravi’s boss reduce his salary?

Now there are a couple of ways of doing these questions. One is by using the concepts of fractions, proportionality, etc. The other one is by using the formula. Let us discuss both of them.

a)     Price of beer has gone up by 25%

b)     A hike of 10% and then a reduction of 10% won’t be fair as Ravi would end up getting less than the original. Using the successive % change formula {10 – 10 + 10*(-10)/100 = -1}, we can say that he would end up getting 1% lesser than the original. To get the correct deduction value:

Ravi’s salary was hiked by 10%

We could have also used the formula for compensating a change of r%:

a) r = 25%. Compensating % change =   – (100*25)/(100+25)

     –20% = reduction of 20%

b) r = 10%. Compensating % change =   – (100*10)/(100+10)

     –9.09% = reduction of 9.09%

 I hope that you found this post useful and that it will help you get a higher percentage and percentile in your exam.

- Ravi Handa

(Ravi Handa, an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur, has been working in the CAT Prep sector for the past 7 years. He currently offers online CAT coaching and preparation for CAT 2015)
Other articles by Ravi Handa can be found here