IIM Ahmedabad Past Years Personal Interview (WAT-PI) Experiences

Mar 21, 2022 | 4 minutes |
Academics - 95/90.5/86 CAT Percentile - 99.99 %ile (IIT Kanpur, Mechanical Engineer, Fresher) Duration: 25 minutes
AWT: Pursuing further studies abroad immediately after graduation or after working and financing yourself.
Interview Experience 2 Panelists - P1 & P2 P1: Where are you from? Me: Answered and then had a bit of discussion about college re-opening. P1: Asked me if I sat for placement and which companies? Me: Answered that I sat for all roles associated with the business domain as a backup if I didn't get into a B-school so that the work experience would be useful. P1: Asked me the company profile and what it does? Me: Answered that I was recruited as an associate consultant at praxis which is a management consulting firm. P1: Asked me the VP of the company, their clients, and the offices Me: Couldn't answer but told him that they majorly dealt in financial services and about the 3 offices in India. P1: You know nothing about business and finance, I don't get why the companies hire people like you. ( I smiled ) Then asked if and how I follow news and if I had any specific interests such as politics, economy, sports. Me: Answered that I read news on online platforms and I am slightly inclined towards sports. P1:  Which sports? Me: Cricket and chess. P1: Asked me names of various deliveries wrt to the length of the ball. Me: Answered Full toss, Yorker, full length, good length, and short length. P1 seemed happy and said well. Handed over to P2. P2: Have you heard of the gender wage gap. Me: Explained. P2: Asked why it existed. Me: Told it was going on for a long time and fewer job opportunities for women meant they agreed to work at lower wages. P2: Asked is there even data to back that the gap exists. Me: Answered that there must be statistical data on wages for similar positions otherwise it would not be discussed so extensively. P2: Asked why reservation for girls was introduced in IITs Me: Answered on the lines of a very low number of girls getting great ranks in JEE which reflected the lack of means and opportunities for them. P2: Is it good? Answered that since there are additional seats, it will bring a positive change in helping girls to get a good education. P2: If the seats weren't additional then? Me: Answered that then it would be taking away opportunities from deserving people and we need to give more opportunities but not at the sake of deserving candidates. Had a bit of discussion where he said I was contradicting myself tried to explain wasn't convinced. P2: Since you have an interest in consulting (never said anything remotely like this), let's do a few cases. Car company manufactures 4 cars and they have different sales volumes and mileage, what would be the average mileage of the company. Me: Answered weighted average. P2: wrong answer Silence for 30 seconds  P2: Said let's take White hat junior as a consultant, would you recommend banning the company. Me: Answered that they targeted 4/5/6-year-olds who weren't in the position to make choices and so they have targetted parents and a ban wasn't needed but need to regulate the claims made by them. P2: I am disappointed, I expected you to do a study. Me: Tried defending that I felt that a study on such young children wasn't feasible. Wasn't convinced again. P1: Asked me if I travel frequently. Me: Answered that I don't travel frequently but had recently visited Rajasthan. P1: How would you compare 2 cities like Jaipur and Udaipur Me: (Clarified if he was asking as a tourist or resident he said the tourist.)Answered on the lines of connectivity to the cities, the number of places to visit, ease and cost of transportation, and other expenses. P1: (not convinced at all) Asked if parameters would change if I was comparing Jaipur and Ajmer. Me: Answered that no I would still use the same parameters. P1: We are done, nice talking to you. Please take a toffee. Exchanged pleasantries and ran for my life.