CAT Prep

RTI Response

Rankings

Placements

Score Vs. %ile

Salaries

Campus Tour

Upskill

Career Show

It Is Time For Reverse Reviews - Strategy with RS

Jun 25, 2015 | 2 minutes |

Join InsideIIM GOLD

Webinars & Workshops

Compare B-Schools

Free CAT Course

Take Free Mock Tests

Upskill With AltUni

CAT Study Planner

CUET-PG Mini Mock 2 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 417

CUET-PG Mini Mock 3 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 176

CUET-PG Mini Mock 1 (By TISS Mumbai HRM&LR)

Participants: 770

MBA Admissions 2024 - WAT 1

Participants: 238

SNAP Quantitative Skills

Participants: 514

SNAP Quant - 1

Participants: 952

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 1

Participants: 947

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 361

SNAP DILR Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 245

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 2

Participants: 440

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 4

Participants: 187

SNAP LR Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 250

SNAP Quant Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 207

SNAP VARC Mini Mock - 3

Participants: 298

SNAP - Quant Mini Mock 5

Participants: 52

XAT Decision Making 2020

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making 2019

Participants: 349

XAT Decision Making 2018

Participants: 448

XAT Decision Making -10

Participants: 586

XAT Decision Making -11

Participants: 457

XAT Decision Making - 12

Participants: 417

XAT Decision Making - 13

Participants: 352

XAT Decision Making - 14

Participants: 354

XAT Decision Making - 15

Participants: 395

XAT Decision Making - 16

Participants: 468

XAT Decision Making - 17

Participants: 511

XAT Decision Making 2021

Participants: 518

LR Topic Test

Participants: 2739

DI Topic Test

Participants: 1240

ParaSummary Topic Test

Participants: 2100

Service providers – restaurants, airlines, banks, Uber are under 24 x 7 ‘review’ by customers.

After consuming the service they are posting reviews which are not going waste. Other customers refer to them for taking decisions. This system assumes that customers are always right. And if at all there is a failure in delivering service the blame lies solely at the doorstep of the service provider.
Reflect for a moment.

The current system is one sided & heavily loaded in favour of customers. Of course, there is every chance that there will be a bad service provider as there is a chances of ‘bad & unruly’ customer. However, should not the system also provide a platform to service providers to rate there customers? This will enable the service fraternity to refer to these reviews while taking a decision on whom to provide service to? Will not implementing this system improve the service experience for every one?


Taking this view, in April 2015, Australia’s Art Series Hotel Group launched Reverse Reviews: a promotion which gave guests the chance to obtain discounts and upgrades in return for being reviewed.

People staying at any of the group’s boutique hotels could opt in to take part, with their behavior and demeanor being ranked and reviews then published online. Any guests who gained ratings over four stars were rewarded with complimentary food and beverages, stays or upgrades.


As a decision maker will you implement Reverse review in your organisation?