According to the latest statistics one-year management course at ISB fetched almost 1100 + offers and placements in year 2016. Which itself is an achievement and shows how career with better opportunities can be crafted and nurtured at ISB.
Growing Demand For One-Year Management Course At ISB
Oops! You've Read 3/3 Articles. Register For Free, Now!
Invest 5 Minutes A Day To Get An Edge Over Your Peers And To Know Happening Inside A B-School
Benefits



Comments

Joe
InsideIIM , an empathizing post on male general category engineers is due :( .. Please do that atleast to make us feeel goood.... Everywhere we look around at this time of the year , it is the helpless state of the not so brilliant engineers who could not rape CAT but did descent. - Just a bit emotions playin , welcome to ignore this comment..!
10 Jan 2013, 11.19 AM
Surya
Despite the assiduous efforts of the IIMs to increase their intake of girls, a double century seems a long shot. Any such possibility, though, would amount to marginalisation of the General male! Diversity: A must The primary objective of any institute of management must be to remedy local problems. And this can only be achieved by putting together a class that reflects the demographics of the population. But the composition of the candidates who make the cut will never reflect that if the composition of the participants itself is deviant. It is no surprise then that the intake of girls through test scores is low, given their low enrollment for the test itself. So any attempt to accommodate more girls into the system is only an intervention to equalise outcomes. Also, the idea of awarding additional points for gender throws up issues of differential ability. Clearly, girls are not in any way inferior to boys: four girls secured 99.99 %ile. So giving away brownie points for gender is a veiled insult to female intelligence. What the institutes must focus on, really, is to improve the diversity of participating students rather than trying to present the illusion of diversity in a batch that is virtually monolithic. They need to introspect on the testing process. Is the examination itself facilitating diversity or is it favorable to only a section of the student population? It's not surprising that CAT is dominated by engineers throughout.
10 Jan 2013, 12.19 PM
Nirmal
This reminds me of classical business cum engineering case study. When your product is not doing well, you should concentrate more on improving the product. I think mere marketing stints of any kind would cause more harm than help.
10 Jan 2013, 02.02 PM
Satwinder
I am definitely in favor of diversity, but not by blatantly giving additional marks to any particular category[not limiting to females alone]. Interesting article overall.
11 Jan 2013, 01.52 PM
rahul
CAT-99.7 Btech-64% 10th- 81% 12th-82% Workex- 3 years, Male Will i get IIM-L call ?
13 Jan 2013, 01.12 PM
AIMCAT 2519 Live Solving By Shashank Prabhu, Founder - Point99 (CAT 100%iler | Seasoned CAT Trainer)
How A Non-Engineer Went From 17%ile to 99+%ile In CAT
CAT 2023 Slot 1 DILR Breakdown ft.Dr.Shashank Prabhu || DILR Dangal Ep.5 || CAT DILR Preparation
I Made It To FMS Delhi With Gap Years ft.Shayari || 99.21%iler CAT 2023
Best 4 Months Strategy To Score 99+%ile in CAT 2024 ft.Pallav Goyal (IIM A)
Comments
Joe
InsideIIM , an empathizing post on male general category engineers is due :( .. Please do that atleast to make us feeel goood.... Everywhere we look around at this time of the year , it is the helpless state of the not so brilliant engineers who could not rape CAT but did descent. - Just a bit emotions playin , welcome to ignore this comment..!
10 Jan 2013, 11.19 AM
Surya
Despite the assiduous efforts of the IIMs to increase their intake of girls, a double century seems a long shot. Any such possibility, though, would amount to marginalisation of the General male! Diversity: A must The primary objective of any institute of management must be to remedy local problems. And this can only be achieved by putting together a class that reflects the demographics of the population. But the composition of the candidates who make the cut will never reflect that if the composition of the participants itself is deviant. It is no surprise then that the intake of girls through test scores is low, given their low enrollment for the test itself. So any attempt to accommodate more girls into the system is only an intervention to equalise outcomes. Also, the idea of awarding additional points for gender throws up issues of differential ability. Clearly, girls are not in any way inferior to boys: four girls secured 99.99 %ile. So giving away brownie points for gender is a veiled insult to female intelligence. What the institutes must focus on, really, is to improve the diversity of participating students rather than trying to present the illusion of diversity in a batch that is virtually monolithic. They need to introspect on the testing process. Is the examination itself facilitating diversity or is it favorable to only a section of the student population? It's not surprising that CAT is dominated by engineers throughout.
10 Jan 2013, 12.19 PM
Nirmal
This reminds me of classical business cum engineering case study. When your product is not doing well, you should concentrate more on improving the product. I think mere marketing stints of any kind would cause more harm than help.
10 Jan 2013, 02.02 PM
Satwinder
I am definitely in favor of diversity, but not by blatantly giving additional marks to any particular category[not limiting to females alone]. Interesting article overall.
11 Jan 2013, 01.52 PM
rahul
CAT-99.7 Btech-64% 10th- 81% 12th-82% Workex- 3 years, Male Will i get IIM-L call ?
13 Jan 2013, 01.12 PM